[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb
From: |
Geoffrey Wossum |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:11:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
On Friday 18 June 2004 8:37 am, Dave Hylands wrote:
> I'd say that the only real portability you could hope for is between
> compiler vendors for the same chip.
Don't forget different versions of the same compiler. I've spent a good bit
of time tracking down problems due to changing compiler versions. If you can
avoid by staying away constructs which are not explicitly defined by either
the C standard, or extensions in your compiler manual, it'll save you many
headaches when you're forced to upgrade your compiler to fix a bug or attain
a new language feature.
---
Geoffrey Wossum
Software Engineer
Long Range Systems - http://www.pager.net
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, (continued)
Re: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, Ned Konz, 2004/06/18
Re: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/06/17
Re: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, David Brown, 2004/06/18
RE: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, Dave Hylands, 2004/06/18
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb,
Geoffrey Wossum <=
RE: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, Dave Hylands, 2004/06/18
RE: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, Dave Hylands, 2004/06/21
RE: [avr-gcc-list] port access with avr-gdb, Dave Hylands, 2004/06/21