[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 8 May 2009 19:53:40 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 6:55 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0
>
> >> 1) -no-inline-small-function - 69034
> >> 2) --param inline-call-cost=2 - 68964
> >> 3) -fno-inline - 68816
> >> 4) -finline-limit=10 - 68810
> >> 5) #2 & #4 - 68754 6)
> -finline-limit=3 -
> >> 68754 (same results for 1,2 and 3)
> >
> > I found that it depends on your source codes
> > To get better code size, you have to try different switches
> combinations.
>
> Is there any way to apply the switches on a per source file basis?
Yes, it's called "using a Makefile". ;-)
- [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Steven Michalske, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, David Kelly, 2009/05/06
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Weddington, Eric, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/05/07
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Schwichtenberg, Knut, 2009/05/07
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Kang Tin LAI, 2009/05/07
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Bob Paddock, 2009/05/08
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Rolf Ebert, 2009/05/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Bob Paddock, 2009/05/09