avr-gcc-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Address of code segment]


From: Robert von Knobloch
Subject: [Fwd: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Address of code segment]
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:19:52 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (X11/20060911)

> org] On Behalf Of Robert von Knobloch
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:53 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Address of code segment
> 
> 
> CODESECTION uint16_t test7(void)
> {
>     uint8_t size7prog;
> 
>     // Write assembler program to tester RAM. BEWARE of page size !!
>     for (size7prog = 0; size7prog < (4 * 32); ++size7prog)
>     parms.flashbuf[size7prog] =
> test_pgm_read_byte((PGM_VOID_P)(&test7prog + size7prog)); *****
> //.........
> // Having got the assembler in the ram buffer parms.flashbuf[ 
> ], I have
> existing routines to transfer the code to the target using ISP.
> //........
> }
> 
> CODESECTION void test7prog(void)
> {
>     asm (   "some assembler code \n\t"
>         : : );
> }
> 
> Although working, the starred line gives the warning "passing 
> argument 1
> of 'test_pgm_read_byte' discards qualifiers from pointer target type"
> I had hoped the cast of (PGM_VOID_P) would help, but it doesn't.
> What is the 'right' way (from the compiler's view) to extract the
> address of the assembler code ?
> (I like a clean compile with no warnings).

You don't show us the prototype of test_pgm_read_byte. This is important 
because this is the line that the warning is happening on. So we need all 
information about this function.



Yes, I realised this later in the day (too late to post, I had gone home).
I found what I had misunderstood and have fixed it this morning.

Just to clarify 'test_pgm_read_byte()' is just a 'jmp pgm_read_byte' (The 
avr-libc function).

I got the address of my assembler code with  'asmbase = 2 * 
(uint16_t)&test7prog;' (x 2 to convert words to bytes)
and passed it with 'test_pgm_read_byte((pgm_uint8_t*)asmbase);'

Many thanks for your help anyway,

Robert 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]