[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Axiom-developer] B#
From: |
C Y |
Subject: |
RE: [Axiom-developer] B# |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:14:12 -0800 (PST) |
--- Bill Page <address@hidden> wrote:
> Or (in the best of all possible worlds :):
>
> b-natural -- single-type langauge
> Aldor compiler -- defines the algebra language and types
> common lisp -- a parenthesized common lisp which is untyped
>
> If we get rid of SPAD and the old Axiom interpreter then BOOT
> becomes irrelevant. But Common Lisp as the base of this "stack"
> still makes good sense to me.
Agreed!
Alright, it's now imperative - we MUST free Aldor somehow! If it can
resolve/remove the old BOOT vs. Lisp code debate, clearly there is
nothing it can't do!
> > Note that Bill and I disagree about boot's future.
>
> True.
Although it sounds like given the availability of both Aldor and
B-natural the argument becomes moot?
Break out the B-natural papers!
Has anybody heard anything new from the Aldor front? Dr. Watt? Would
it help to send the petition to NAG?
Cheers,
CY
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#,
C Y <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] B#, Bill Page, 2006/03/27
- Re: [Axiom-developer] B#, root, 2006/03/23