[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb
From: |
Ralf Hemmecke |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb |
Date: |
Tue, 09 May 2006 21:24:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) |
Hi Bill,
... noweb modifications ...
The bottom line here is that I agree with Norman that
modifying noweb's behavior is not the correct solution
and that if anything it should be more exact and strict.
Actually, I did not say that I want to modify noweb in any way.
To me it was only not clear enough how noweb should behave in such
situations.
Unfortunately, the website http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr/noweb/ is not
very explicit about pointing to a nice documentation that describes the
semantics of all the various situations where << and >> can appear
(non-escaped) in a simple and understandable manner. (At least such a
link is not very obvious to me.) I would have to get the noweb sources
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~nr/noweb/dist/ and figure out which of the
many files I have to weave in order to find the right documentation. :-(
In fact, that documentation situation is very much like in Axiom. All
files are literate programs, but it is hard to find a rough overview of
the building process, for example.
I hope an extended ALLPROSE (http://www.hemmecke.de/aldor/) will some
day remedy this situation. I'm not yet there, but I am working on it.
All the best
Ralf
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/05/04
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/05
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb,
Ralf Hemmecke <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/05