Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex

[Jay Belanger]

root <address@hidden> writes:
...
> Although noweb implements three of four features I don't see it as a
> requirement. Indeed there has been discussion of other formats such as
...
> * latex macro forms which replace the <<>> syntax with
>               \begin{chunk}{chunkname}, not yet public.

Can one infer that there is (the beginnings of) one which is private?

Jay