[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again |
Date: |
17 Nov 2006 15:51:42 +0100 |
C Y <address@hidden> writes:
| Waldek Hebisch wrote:
| > Martin Rubey wrote:
| >> C Y <address@hidden> writes:
| >>
| >>> I think we should make the decision as a project not to wait any longer
for
| >>> Aldor, and commit to improving SPAD - up until now I think there has been
| >>> hesitation to commit serious effort to SPAD due to the possibility of
Aldor
| >>> becoming available and making such work unnecessary. To my mind the first
| >>> step to improving SPAD is to decide what SPAD should be, since right now
it
| >>> doesn't have a formal language definition.
| >> For me this is totally clear: SPAD should become a free implementation of
the
| >> Aldor language. It would not make sense to have to different languages
around.
| >>
| >
| > I am affraid we will have two different languages: there are legal reasons
|
| Indeed. The Aldor documentation is not free at all, and any attempt to
| define Aldor in a literate style would have to duplicate Aldor without
| duplicating too closely its documentation - that's a real problem.
I cannot parse this. Could you elaborate?
| > and technical ones: I do not see why we should limit ourselfs to capabilites
| > present in Aldor and (assuming that we want this) implementing _all_
| > capabilities of Aldor is likely to take long time. I do not want to
| > underestimate big things (dependent types) but getting little details
| > 100% compatible would probably take more time.
|
| I don't know the full history of Aldor, but my impression is that it
| grew beyond just being "the language used to implement mathematics in
| Axiom" into a more general purpose language. We need a language to
| implement mathematics in Axiom, so hopefully retaining that focus will
| make the task somewhat simpler.
You don't need a language to do *just* mathematics in Axiom. You also
need a language to communicate with the world around. All major
systems for computation mathematics have grown into that position.
Don't get blindsighted.
[...]
| I think that will be an important discussion to be had as a project -
| just how compatible with Aldor we want to stay.
Probably. I would like to see a discussion about what is necessary to
support computational mathematics in Axiom, rather than how closely SPAD
should ressemble another language.
-- Gaby
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Ping: case insensitive filesystems, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Ping: case insensitive filesystems, C Y, 2006/11/16
- [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Peter Broadbery, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Peter Broadbery, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Peter Broadbery, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, C Y, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again,
Gabriel Dos Reis <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/11/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: SPAD and Aldor again, Martin Rubey, 2006/11/17