I once was refactoring the library and at some point just realized that it's going to take far less time if I just rewrote it.
I won't even elaborate on this idea as all those ancient devices laying around in their own puke of wires and cables speak for themselves. Combine the power of unix shell with wide adoption of AppleScript and you can achieve pretty much anything. Whereas with feeds everything is about attention: I like this topic and I want to read more on it, that author is funny and I'd like to check out her other blogs, etc.
Hopefully nothing broke in the process, but please drop me a line if you see anything suspicious. As much as I agree with you both on the "I need to manage my news articles" vs. I promise it's the last one. It means Mac OS uses collections of smaller apps to do the job instead of packing it all into a single package.
But when I came home and researched this a little bit to my great surprise I've discovered that this is exactly what they recommend the cadence should be for the best running economy.
In my case, for example, I have close to half a thousand feeds that I subscribe to.
binhex-archive", "com. That puts me in an awkward position. Feeds require a radically different approach. for creating MacOS X applications that execute a bundled script. Refactoring says you can't break interfaces. Maybe with Pandora we can start a new trend of ignoring artist labels and shining the spotlight back on the music.
macbinary-archive", "public. I even have a couple of drawers with unmarked hangers and labeled files in them. Here are some tools to help you in your search. binhex-archive", "com.