[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[be] [task #10011] runtime vs buildtime dependencies
From: |
Teus Benschop |
Subject: |
[be] [task #10011] runtime vs buildtime dependencies |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:45:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091215 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Firefox/3.5.6 |
URL:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?10011>
Summary: runtime vs buildtime dependencies
Project: Bibledit
Submitted by: teus
Submitted on: Tue 29 Dec 2009 07:45:04 AM CAT
Should Start On: Tue 29 Dec 2009 12:00:00 AM CAT
Should be Finished on: Tue 29 Dec 2009 12:00:00 AM CAT
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
re distinguishing runtime vs build-time dependencies: I do not think it
> should be up to bibledit to dictate which php capable server is
> available at build time as long as there is something which executes
> scripts at run time. And I think it is better if this is essentially a
> matter for the user or - if a must - the packager.
So making openssh a package dependency in ubuntu, but not at build time
> appears to me the right way forward and a simple warning that no
> webserver appears to be running should be all that bibledit does about
> IPC/apache.
>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?10011>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [be] [task #10011] runtime vs buildtime dependencies,
Teus Benschop <=