bison-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU Bison 1.50a] testsuite.log: 19 failures


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: [GNU Bison 1.50a] testsuite.log: 19 failures
Date: 25 Oct 2002 10:04:04 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter)

| > From: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
| > Date: 24 Oct 2002 11:14:18 +0200
| > 
| > | Before releasing 1.75a, we should make sure the testsuite
| > | version-number bug isn't present in the tar file.  I vaguely recall
| > | doing this by hand for Bison 1.50; sorry, I should have fixed it then
| > | but I was in a hurry and still don't fully understand the release
| > | procedure.
| > 
| > What do you mean?  The release procedure is doing plenty of other
| > things, agreed, but I'm talking about a plain make dist: I never
| > managed to have it keep an obsolete testsuite :(
| 
| Ah, I was talking about "make alpha".

Hum, I think I added even more confusion :)  When you said `doing by
hand' I did understood make alpha failed for you, but even by hand you
ran make dist, which (should) makes sure the test suite is up to date.

| "make alpha" fails for me on Solaris, since it puts too many m4 files
| into m4/* and then later complains when they're not there in the
| tarball. 

How bizarre...  Anyway, make alpha does not try to be portable (for a
start it uses GNU make :).

| I don't know why it does that, but I work around the problem
| by running it on GNU/Linux.

OK.


Having the beta is a good thing for the translations, but I don't
think we should aim at a release so soon.  My plans for the next
release includes addressing the lex-param, parse-param, and yyerror
issues.  AFAICS, there is no need (= no bug fix) for a replacement of
1.75, right?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]