Re: glr.c: Token definitions

[Joel E. Denny]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:

> I propose that newer skeletons define the tokens only using enums, not
> #defines in addition.  That's already the case for C++, but I propose
> that we do the same for glr.c.  In practice, it only means to apply
> the following patch.  Any objection?

I've been hoping this would happen.  I have a C++ project that can
encapsulate either the yacc or GLR global symbols into namespaces.  It's
easy to encapsulate yytokentype, but these redundant #define's remain as
global namespace pollution.

Joel