Re: no users destructors if stack 0 deleted

[Joel E. Denny]

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:

> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > There are significant changes in yyparse() in addition to
> > yyprocessOneStack().  Is this important?
>
> Yes, I missed that.  Can you please write a corrected ChangeLog entry?
> Thanks.

Is the following ok?

Joel

--- ChangeLog   6 Dec 2005 19:38:25 -0000       1.1365
+++ ChangeLog   7 Dec 2005 01:34:32 -0000
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 2005-12-06  "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden>

-       * data/glr.c (yyprocessOneStack): Synchronize the shift for all
-       stacks, and iterate another stack in order to call user
-       destructors.
+       * data/glr.c (yyprocessOneStack, yyparse): Synchronize the shift for
+       all stacks.
+       (yyparse): Iterate another stack in order to call user destructors.
        * tests/glr-regression.at (No users destructors if stack 0 deleted):
        New test case.
        (Duplicated user destructor for lookahead): This test now is expected