Re: glr.c: Token definitions

[Akim Demaille]

>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:

 > On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:
 >> I agree.  In fact I'm toying with a C++ wrapper around the glr.c
 >> parser.  It raised a few issues with the lalr1.cc parser that I'd like
 >> to sort out so that glr.cc can be a drop-in replacement of lalr1.cc.
 >> It's in very primitive state, but it's very doable.  But first of all,
 >> I'd like to clean up (again!) the lalr1.cc parser: there are a couple
 >> of bad things, including the fact that these tokens are defined in the
 >> top level namespace instead of instead the parser class...  And many
 >> other similar details.

 > It will be great when you have all this fully implemented and documented.
 > I might drop my own project if your skeletons prove easier to use and more
 > stable.

Hi Joel,

Have you given a try to glr.cc?