[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:42:27 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
> Paul, in English you'd write mid-rule action, right?
Yes.
> And in code? mid_rule, midrule?
Either would be fine. Currently the code uses both spellings (in
different contexts), which is confusing. I mildly prefer "midrule" as
it's shorter and combines better with other things, e.g.,
"grammar_midrule_action" is slightly easier to read than
"grammar_mid_rule_action".
> USE (($1, $2, $<foo>3, $<bar>4, $5));
That is indeed annoying. I suppose, though, that if someone writes
code that bad they deserve to get annoyed.
- Re: %destructor feedback, (continued)