[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --version for CVS Bison
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: --version for CVS Bison |
Date: |
Mon, 29 May 2006 14:25:41 -0400 (EDT) |
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Le 29 mai 06 ? 08:29, Paul Eggert a ?crit :
>
> > All other things being equal, it's better for --version output to be
> > consistent with the rest of the program.
I agree, but I think the technical difficulties Akim described outway this
concern.
> > Otherwise we'd have to
> > document the inconsistency, and explain why it's inconsistent, and I
> > suspect that whatever explanation we come up with (which I don't fully
> > understand myself yet) would cause more trouble than it'd cure.
I don't see it so much as an inconsistency. I just figure --version gives
more information than VERSION itself does.
> I would have selected Joel's solution, but with a new change-id.c file
> to save cycles.
What would be in that file?
Joel
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, (continued)
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/21
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Joel E. Denny, 2006/05/28
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/28
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Joel E. Denny, 2006/05/28
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/29
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Joel E. Denny, 2006/05/29
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/29
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Akim Demaille, 2006/05/29
- Re: --version for CVS Bison,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Akim Demaille, 2006/05/30
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Joel E. Denny, 2006/05/30
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Akim Demaille, 2006/05/30
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Joel E. Denny, 2006/05/30
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Akim Demaille, 2006/05/31
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Joel E. Denny, 2006/05/31
- Re: --version for CVS Bison, Akim Demaille, 2006/05/29