Re: redeclarations: say "previous" not "first" declaration

[Akim Demaille]

Le 7 juil. 06 à 23:25, Joel E. Denny a écrit :

> Well, it bugged me, so I committed this.

I find it weird that we refer to the previous declaration.  Either
we accept a single declaration, and therefore keep only the first
active and complain about those which are not "first", or we accept
redefinition, and we just don't complain.

Since we do not accept redefinitions (and the places that were
recently spotted are divergent from this scheme such as %define
were considered bugged), I don't understand this patch.