Re: [SPAM] Re: proposal: simplify prologue alternatives into %code

[Joel E. Denny]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Paul Eggert wrote:

> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I believe %define "NAME" "VALUE" is currently only used for the C++ 
> > skeletons.  Should we continue to support it for backward compatibility 
> > but deprecate it in favor of the unquoted NAME form?  Or can we just get 
> > rid of it?
> 
> The latter, I'd say.  I don't think anybody but ourselves is using
> this feature.  (I assume it's not documented.)

It appears in the C++ examples in the documentation.  Are we concerned 
with backward compatibility for the C++ skeletons yet?