Re: proposal: simplify prologue alternatives into %code

[Hans Aberg]

On 9 Jan 2007, at 15:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

> > One reason against making this the required method of  
> > implementation, is that one may end up with a polymorphic class  
> > library, which uses its own way of extracting the objects.
>
> Not a big case of interface mismatch.

If you think that, you are of course free to fix it your own way.

You idea is to let the C++ polymorphic class implementation to  
emulate the implementation of a C 'union', and such ties between  
unrelated features in different languages does not seem wise to me.

  Hans Aberg