Re: FYI: Missing \n

[Paolo Bonzini]

> (maybe sym(@bam) or something?)

No, please, because...

> Perhaps we should reuse the %use notation rather than combine unused value 
> declarations with the value name notation:
>
>   %destructor { free ($$); } sym
>   sym: sym sym sym %use $2 { $$ = sym_new ($1, $3); }

> With named values:
>
>   %destructor { free ($$); } sym
>   sym(foo): sym(bar) sym(bam) sym(baz) %use $bam {
>     $foo = sym_new ($bar, $baz);
>   }

... I like these so much more (except that I'd use %unused instead of 
%use, also in Akim's proposal).

Maybe, in the latter case:

sym(foo): sym(bar) sym(%unused) sym(baz)
sym(foo): sym(bar) sym(bam %unused) sym(baz)

Paolo