Re: <reductions>

[Tim Van Holder]

Joel E. Denny wrote:
>> For bison you could use "urn:x-gnu:bison:2.3b" or something.
> 
> Is there a precedent for this?  I guess x = xml?

The "x-" prefix stands for experimental; without it, the URN would be
'nonstandard' because the first word after the initial 'urn:' is the
namespace name and namespaces need to be officially registered for it
to be a 'real' URN. Exception is the experimental namespaces, which is
why I used one - I have no idea if there's more appropriate namespaces
already available.