[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: documentation for typed mid-rule actions
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: documentation for typed mid-rule actions |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:15:41 +0200 |
> Le 12 août 2018 à 17:57, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
>
>> On 12 Aug 2018, at 11:33, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I would also like to enforce consistency in Bison which uses
>> both midrule and mid-rule. I am in favor of ‘midrule'
>> (shorter, consistent with our move to lookahead instead of
>> look-ahead, more consistent between code and doc as there is
>> no conversion from dash to underscore, etc.), but I am not
>> a native! To which one should we stick? (FWIW, neither
>> appear in the manual of YACC, only ‘An action appearing in the
>> middle of a rule […]’ does).
>
> Use midrule: all search hits seem to refer to Bison.
Good point :)
Also, on ‘mid-rule’, Google asks me ‘did you mean midrule?’.
But it seems that it’s mainly because of LaTeX’s \midrule.