Re: [patch] gram.c: Print tokens in grammar_dump

[kaneko y]

Hi,

> Could you please forward it (privately) to me?

Yes, I forwarded email from FSF to you privately.

> Could you restore token?

I got it.
I updated diff and will send patch as attachment to avoid patch to be
broken.

Thanks.



2019年11月10日(日) 23:41 Akim Demaille <address@hidden>:

> Hi Kaneko,
>
> > Le 9 nov. 2019 à 02:14, kaneko y <address@hidden> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My assignment/disclaimer process with the FSF is completed.
>
> Great news!  Yet I have not received the confirmation from the FSF
> itself.  Could you please forward it (privately) to me?
>
> > And I updated the patch based on feedbacks.
>
> I cannot install this commit, the various layers of the email broke it.
> Could you please attach it?
>
>
> > I change "Tokens" to "Terminals" because "Terminals" corresponding to
> "Non terminal".
>
> I agree it would be logical.  Yet we use token and non terminal in the
> documentation, even if token/variable and terminal/non terminal would be
> more coherent.
>
> Could you restore token?  Thanks in advance!

print_tokens.diff
Description: Binary data