[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks
From: |
Daniel Jensen |
Subject: |
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:33:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>
>> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I'm not entirely opposed to the idea, but maybe `r' should
>>> follow the same "process/prefix convention" as `k', `c', et al.?
>>
>> I guess it could, but then I also think I'd want to use `r'
>> on a single line even when there are marked tracks around.
>
> You could always do `1 r' or `C-SPC C-SPC n r'...
Well, sure, there's always a way around things. But my idea was that,
like `RET', `r' is something that should not operate on marked tracks.
Obviously, it's up for debate, but I don't have much more to say about
this. You go ahead with whatever you think is best.
>> The nice thing about `M-&' is that users can use it for
>> things that we never thought of. Every Bongo command will
>> have support for marks, in a way.
>
> I suppose that's true. But let's at least try to think
> about which commands should have support for marks.
I can't think of anything now.
I think we have a good set of commands for marks. Adding more stuff in
the future is easy. Now, if only more people would test this ...
> Then of course there are probably other, non-Bongo-specific
> commands which we won't ever think of, --- as you say, ---
> but which some users may eventually want to use with `M-&'.
Yes! I want to use `M-& C-x e'.
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/01
- Message not available
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/03
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/03
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/04
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks,
Daniel Jensen <=
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/06
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/07
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/08
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/08
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12