[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ksh should come first
From: |
Masao Uebayashi |
Subject: |
Re: ksh should come first |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:51:22 +0900 |
> Masao> you should mention Ksh first because people of Linux generation
> Masao> should realize that Ksh's appearence affected Bash and other
> Masao> newer shells.
>
> Patches are most welcome!
The following is it.
Regards,
Masao
--- autoconf.texi.orig Wed Oct 18 10:42:06 2000
+++ autoconf.texi Fri Oct 27 10:49:28 2000
@@ -4908,7 +4908,7 @@
When writing your own checks, there are some shell script programming
techniques you should avoid in order to make your code portable. The
-Bourne shell and upward-compatible shells like Bash and the Korn shell
+Bourne shell and upward-compatible shells like the Korn shell and Bash
have evolved over the years, but to prevent trouble, do not take
advantage of features that were added after @sc{unix} version 7, circa
1977. You should not use shell functions, aliases, negated character