[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ksh should come first

From: Masao Uebayashi
Subject: Re: ksh should come first
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:51:22 +0900

> Masao> you should mention Ksh first because people of Linux generation
> Masao> should realize that Ksh's appearence affected Bash and other
> Masao> newer shells.
> Patches are most welcome!

The following is it.


--- autoconf.texi.orig  Wed Oct 18 10:42:06 2000
+++ autoconf.texi       Fri Oct 27 10:49:28 2000
@@ -4908,7 +4908,7 @@
 When writing your own checks, there are some shell script programming
 techniques you should avoid in order to make your code portable.  The
-Bourne shell and upward-compatible shells like Bash and the Korn shell
+Bourne shell and upward-compatible shells like the Korn shell and Bash
 have evolved over the years, but to prevent trouble, do not take
 advantage of features that were added after @sc{unix} version 7, circa
 1977.  You should not use shell functions, aliases, negated character

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]