Re: autoconf 2.49c AC_CACHE_CHECK failure

[Nicolas Joly]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:59:17PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Joly <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> Nicolas> Why do we need both AT_CHECK and AT_CHECK_CONFIGURE calls
> Nicolas> here ?
> 
> Nicolas> AT_CHECK_CONFIGURE([-q], 0, [])
> 
> Right, more beautiful.  Will fix, thanks!

My proposal was to remove the second `AT_CHECK_CONFIGURE' call too,
which produce the failure (sorry if i was unclear). It runs a normal
configure generating the famous `loading site script ...' line.

Extracted for testsuite.log :

[...]
====================================
Testing suite for GNU Autoconf 2.49d
====================================
23. ./base.at:205: testing AC_CACHE_CHECK...
./base.at:212: autoconf --autoconf-dir .. -l $at_srcdir 
./base.at:213: top_srcdir=$top_srcdir ./configure -q
stdout:
./base.at:215: top_srcdir=$top_srcdir ./configure 
0a1
> configure: loading site script /usr/local/share/config.site
./base.at:215: config.log
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
[...]

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Informatique Scientifique
Institut Pasteur, Paris.