Re: strncasecmp dcl

[Werner LEMBERG]

[No longer Cc'ed to address@hidden and address@hidden

> Now, I took some more time to think about it, and here is my
> proposal: when $4 is not given (was introduced in 2.50a, did not
> exist before, so we are free to do whatever we want with it), just
> do what Autoconf always did: merely check it can be preprocessed ---
> yuck, how sad CPP was chosen here :-( ---, but when $4 is given,
> test with the compiler.

I like this.  If it is properly documented (with an example), I don't
see any problems.

Will you add a predefined test for string.h/strings.h (which I would
like to see)?


    Werner