[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: autoconf 2.52

From: Steven G. Johnson
Subject: Re: autoconf 2.52
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 19:55:06 -0400 (EDT)

On 9 Aug 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> But what should be the policy wrt failure?  Does it make sense to keep
> just a warning?  Shouldn't it be an error?

It's not necessarily a fatal error...e.g. in this case, it will only fail
when linking C code to Fortran code if the latter calls Fortran intrinsic


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]