[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tiny typoes

From: Tim Van Holder
Subject: Re: tiny typoes
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:27:15 +0200

>  # If you use the `AT_CHECK([command >out])' be sure to have the test
> -# suite introduces spurious failures.
> +# suite that introduces spurious failures.

Actually, this still sounds wrong.
This seems better:

   So if you use `AT_CHECK([command >out])', you're sure to get a
   test suite that will show spurious failures.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]