bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: autoconf 2.53: no more acconfig.h?


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: autoconf 2.53: no more acconfig.h?
Date: 14 Mar 2002 16:34:35 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)

>>>>> "Karl" == Karl Berry <address@hidden> writes:

Karl> I get a loud warnings from autoheader now: cd . && /bin/sh
Karl> /u/texinfo/src/missing --run autoheader WARNING: Using auxiliary
Karl> files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot' WARNING: and
Karl> `config.h.top', to define templates for `config.h.in' WARNING:
Karl> is deprecated and discouraged.

Karl> Fine, but hey, I didn't create acconfig.h myself.  So how can I
Karl> avoid using it?  

!!! Where does it come from?

Karl> I'm just running aclocal/automake/autoconf/configure, my
Karl> configure.ac doesn't have any AC_DEFINE's in it.  

Worst yet...

Karl> Seems like it's not me, the poor old maintainer, you need to
Karl> complain to, it's whoever wrote the Autoconf macros.  

Nope.  No Autoconf macro require such as acconfig.h.

Karl> Mostly AM_GNU_GETTEXT, from the look of acconfig.h.  Plus
Karl> AC_HEADER_TIOCGWINSZ, and PACKAGE/VERSION.

Karl> If I'm supposed to do something in my sources, please advise.

You should complain to the person who is responsible for this, and I
must say I don't know.  Maybe indeed the newest Gettext creates this
file, which is extremely unwelcome.  But in any case, note that these
are only warnings.

Gettextize should use the 3 args form of AC_DEFINE.  I don't know why
you'd have an acconfig.h.  IIRC, it's not even from 2.50, it's from 2.13.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]