bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nicolas Joly <address@hidden>] Re: CVS automake testsuite failures


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: [Nicolas Joly <address@hidden>] Re: CVS automake testsuite failures under Tru64 unix
Date: 07 Jun 2002 09:48:24 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter)

Wow!  Indeed, it looks like for some reason, AC_PACKAGE_TARNAME was
defined to AC_PACKAGE_TARNAME, so it recurses slightly too much.

I'm a bit lost in this thread.  What _exact_ version of Autoconf is
this?


Also, the traces contain something extremely suspicous:

m4trace:configure.in:1: -1- m4_define([AC_PACKAGE_TARNAME], [am--ŸR.ŸR€
ãR..ãR
€
×H Autom4te×H°
ƒr autoconf.m4fr_(P autoheader.m4f(P€
 autoconf.m4 ¸

þ acgeneral.m4þ
‚M 
acoldnames.m4Mç
E 
acspecific.m4Ez
éO 
autoheader.m4éO
€
îQ
acconfig.hîQ
€,acfunctions,
µ
’    acheaders’
ô
X 
acidentifiersX!‚
×
acprograms×r
A
acmakevarsAß
Z
m4sugar.m4Zj_m4sh.m4_X*       aclang.m4*` acversion.m4
À
ƒ acfunctions.m4ƒ
Õ
^ acheaders.m4^#actypes.m4€\kKINSTALLkK
Ç
ŽaclibrariesŽ(‚™Km4sugar™K&‚JautoconfJ
³

Íautotestͧ
€autoscan$€ 
#inst.451019#


No doubt that the problem is here.  What the heck is this crap?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]