Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-autoconf (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu Oct 31 2002 12:33:22 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• October 31, 2002
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Akim Demaille, 12:33
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Bruno Haible, 09:26
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Akim Demaille, 09:04
  • Re: Intel compiler and autoconf, Akim Demaille, 08:38
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Bruno Haible, 08:35
  • Re: confusing message in AC_PROG_MAKE_SET, Akim Demaille, 08:22
  • Re: Intel compiler and autoconf, Akim Demaille, 04:17
  • Re: Intel compiler and autoconf, Akim Demaille, 02:42
  • Re: Intel compiler and autoconf, Tim Van Holder, 02:25
  • Re: conditionally using AC_PROG_CXX, Ralf Corsepius, 00:59
• October 30, 2002
  • Re: Intel compiler and autoconf, David Mathog, 13:36
  • Re: Intel compiler and autoconf, Pavel Roskin, 11:59
  • Re: Intel compiler and autoconf, Tim Van Holder, 11:32
  • Intel compiler and autoconf, David Mathog, 11:09
  • Re: confusing message in AC_PROG_MAKE_SET, Bruno Haible, 07:35
  • Re: conditionally using AC_PROG_CXX, Akim Demaille, 07:03
  • Re: confusing message in AC_PROG_MAKE_SET, Akim Demaille, 05:35
  • Re: havoc with ~/.autom4te.cfg, Akim Demaille, 04:10
• October 29, 2002
  • A larger gold balance!, Nobody, 19:27
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Paul Eggert, 15:31
  • Re: havoc with ~/.autom4te.cfg, Akim Demaille, 09:44
  • Re: havoc with ~/.autom4te.cfg, Tim Van Holder, 09:39
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Akim Demaille, 08:54
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Bruno Haible, 08:20
  • Re: failed config.h substitution, Akim Demaille, 08:15
  • Re: havoc with ~/.autom4te.cfg, Akim Demaille, 08:06
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Akim Demaille, 07:58
  • Re: _AC_FUNC_VFORK with C++ compiler, Akim Demaille, 07:51
  • Re: autoconf-2.54b doc bug (resent), Akim Demaille, 07:49
  • AC_FUNC_MALLOC, Bruno Haible, 07:23
  • havoc with ~/.autom4te.cfg, Bruno Haible, 07:21
  • _AC_FUNC_VFORK with C++ compiler, Bruno Haible, 07:17
  • confusing message in AC_PROG_MAKE_SET, Bruno Haible, 07:15
  • failed config.h substitution, Bruno Haible, 07:14
  • autoconf-2.54b doc bug (resent), Bruno Haible, 07:11
  • conditionally using AC_PROG_CXX, Ralf Corsepius, 06:56
  • Re: Autoconf 2.54b released, Akim Demaille, 05:02
  • Re: Autoconf 2.54b released, Ralf Corsepius, 00:44
• October 28, 2002
  • Re: Autoconf 2.54b released, Akim Demaille, 12:37
  • Re: Autoconf 2.54b released, Ralf Corsepius, 11:11
  • Re: config.log for sunos, Akim Demaille, 02:23
  • Re: CVS testsuite failure if m4 is called gm4..., Akim Demaille, 02:15
  • Re: CVS: NEWS should document that old options are removed..., Akim Demaille, 02:05
• October 27, 2002
  • Re: config.log for sunos, Paul Eggert, 01:02
• October 26, 2002
  • config.log for sunos, Aharon Robbins, 15:56
• October 25, 2002
  • [GNU Autoconf 2.54a] testsuite: 3 failed, Paul Jarc, 15:41
• October 24, 2002
  • removing the old build/host/target compatibility code (Was: current glibc vs debian sid), Akim Demaille, 05:32
• October 23, 2002
  • [GNU Autoconf 2.54] testsuite.log: 1 failures, Andreas Matthias, 20:47
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 19:41
  • Re: CVS: NEWS should document that old options are removed..., ezra peisach, 12:57
  • Re: CVS: NEWS should document that old options are removed..., Akim Demaille, 11:09
  • Re: CVS: NEWS should document that old options are removed..., ezra peisach, 10:03
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Akim Demaille, 06:34
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Franz Sirl, 06:21
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Akim Demaille, 03:51
  • Re: CVS: NEWS should document that old options are removed..., Akim Demaille, 03:45
• October 22, 2002
  • CVS: NEWS should document that old options are removed..., ezra peisach, 15:04
  • CVS testsuite failure if m4 is called gm4..., ezra peisach, 13:57
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Franz Sirl, 09:34
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Akim Demaille, 08:40
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Akim Demaille, 08:38
  • Re: Solved! don't use cmp (Was: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28), H.Merijn Brand, 07:59
  • Re: autoconf 2.5x and SunOS don't seem to mix, Akim Demaille, 07:43
  • Re: Solved! don't use cmp (Was: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28), Akim Demaille, 07:41
  • Re: automake 2.5x and SunOS don't seem to mix, Aharon Robbins, 07:30
  • Re: Autoheader @ interpolation, Akim Demaille, 07:14
  • Re: Autoheader @ interpolation, Akim Demaille, 04:20
  • Re: automake 2.5x and SunOS don't seem to mix, Akim Demaille, 03:46
• October 21, 2002
  • automake 2.5x and SunOS don't seem to mix, Aharon Robbins, 17:50
  • Re: Autoheader @ interpolation, Carlos Velasco, 07:53
  • Re: (no subject) but about 2.53, Akim Demaille, 04:25
• October 19, 2002
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 05:15
  • Re: Autoheader @ interpolation, Akim Demaille, 04:56
  • Re: `-f' ignored? autom4te.cache issue?, Akim Demaille, 03:01
  • cry for Assistance, mariam seseseko, 01:22
  • address@hidden: Re: current glibc vs debian sid], Paul Eggert, 00:58
  • Solved! don't use cmp (Was: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28), Akim Demaille, 00:22
• October 18, 2002
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 22:51
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 22:00
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 19:56
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 19:38
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Roland McGrath, 16:46
  • testsuite.log of autoconf-2.54, Stefan Kost, 16:42
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Roland McGrath, 16:42
  • Re: current glibc vs debian sid, Paul Eggert, 16:36
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, H.Merijn Brand, 16:04
  • Re: `-f' ignored? autom4te.cache issue?, Akim Demaille, 15:03
  • (no subject), Michael Bishop, 13:56
• October 15, 2002
  • Re: autoconf 2.52 bug, Paul Eggert, 14:09
• October 14, 2002
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, H.Merijn Brand, 03:12
• October 11, 2002
  • Re: `-f' ignored? autom4te.cache issue?, Akim Demaille, 12:00
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 10:10
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, H.Merijn Brand, 10:08
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 09:56
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] failures: 28, Akim Demaille, 09:37
• October 10, 2002
  • `-f' ignored? autom4te.cache issue?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 11:45
• October 09, 2002
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.54] testsuite.log: 1 failures, Paul Eggert, 20:05
  • Need help getting F77+F90 working in autoconf, Tamara L Dahlgren, 15:17
  • [GNU Autoconf 2.54] testsuite.log: 1 failures, Bob Hutzel, 13:06
• October 08, 2002
  • [GNU Autoconf 2.54] testsuite.log: 1 failures, H.Merijn Brand, 07:12
  • welcome to china and mobile phone, onesung, 06:08
• October 07, 2002
  • Re: texinfo.tex not included in the autoconf distribution, Akim Demaille, 07:37
  • Re: texinfo.tex not included in the autoconf distribution, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 06:02
  • Re: texinfo.tex not included in the autoconf distribution, Akim Demaille, 05:42
  • texinfo.tex not included in the autoconf distribution, Aharon Robbins, 04:10

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc