|
From: | Ben Pfaff |
Subject: | Bug#233969: [Branden Robinson] Bug#233969: xrender_0.8.3-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends? |
Date: | Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:45:36 -0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Here's another report from the Debian X maintainer. -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:50:43 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <address@hidden> To: address@hidden Cc: address@hidden Subject: Re: Bug#233969: xrender_0.8.3-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends? Message-ID: <address@hidden> References: <address@hidden> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden> Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: address@hidden
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:23:17PM -0700, address@hidden wrote: > Package: xrender > Version: 0.8.3-6 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of xrender_0.8.3-6 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.4 > > Build started at 20040221-0053 > > [...] > > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.12), debhelper (>= 4.0.0), pkg-config, > > libx11-dev, render-dev, x-dev > > [...] > > > **** The following central src deps are (probably) missing: > > xlibs-dev (>> 4.1.0) > > [...] > > > checking for ld used by g++... /usr/bin/ld > > checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes > > checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... > > yes > > checking for g++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC > > checking if g++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes > > checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes > > checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... > > yes > > checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so > > checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate > > checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes > > appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool > > checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no > > checking for X... no > > configure: error: X is required, but it was either disabled or not found. > > make: *** [config.status] Error 1 > > A full build log can be found at: > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=xrender&ver=0.8.3-6 LaMont and I discussed this on IRC. Turns out the AC_PATH_XTRA autoconf macro is garbage. Unfortunately, further research reveals AC_PATH_X is too. You can build Xlib-based applications with only x-dev and libx11-dev (which depends on libx11-6) installed, but autoconf doesn't seem to know that. The file lists for these three packages are attached. I think this means the AC_PATH_X and AC_PATH_XTRA macros are buggy. Is there any change the upstream autoconf people would agree? -- G. Branden Robinson | That's the saving grace of humor: Debian GNU/Linux | if you fail, no one is laughing at address@hidden | you. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- A. Whitney Brown
x-dev.list
Description: Text document
libx11-dev.list
Description: Text document
libx11-6.list
Description: Text document
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-------------------- End of forwarded message -------------------- -- "Q: How does a hacker fix a function which doesn't work for all of the elements in its domain? A: He changes the domain." --Thorfinn
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |