bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: automake 1.7.9 : wrong order of creation config header and stamp fil


From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Subject: Re: automake 1.7.9 : wrong order of creation config header and stamp file.
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:00:50 +0200

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:00:09PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Updating goal targets....
> Considering target file `all'.
>  File `all' does not exist.
>   Considering target file `config.h'.
>     Considering target file `stamp-h1'.
>       Considering target file `../config.h.in'.
>         Pruning file `../configure.ac'.
>         Pruning file `../aclocal.m4'.
>        Finished prerequisites of target file `../config.h.in'.
>        Prerequisite `../configure.ac' is older than target `../config.h.in'.
>        Prerequisite `../aclocal.m4' is older than target `../config.h.in'.
>       No need to remake target `../config.h.in'.
>       Pruning file `config.status'.
>      Finished prerequisites of target file `stamp-h1'.
>      Prerequisite `../config.h.in' is older than target `stamp-h1'.
>      Prerequisite `config.status' is older than target `stamp-h1'.
>     No need to remake target `stamp-h1'.
>    Finished prerequisites of target file `config.h'.
>    Prerequisite `stamp-h1' is newer than target `config.h'.
>   Must remake target `config.h'.
> Got a SIGCHLD; 1 unreaped children.
> Putting child 0x0807e730 (config.h) PID 29798 on the chain.
> [...etc...]

Could you quote that trace until config.status is run?
`Must remake target `config.h'' is not synonym of `must run `config.status''
as I've tried to explain in my previous mail.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]