bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

You wanted to see this?


From: Jonathan Armitage
Subject: You wanted to see this?
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 12:01:31 +0100

When running configure for readline-5.0 on Solaris 9 (a V210 with latest
SunOS patches installed) using gcc-3.3.2, I got:

checking for limits.h... yes
checking sys/ptem.h usability... no
checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------ ##
configure: WARNING:     ## Report this to address@hidden ##
configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------ ##
checking for sys/ptem.h... yes
checking sys/pte.h usability... no
checking sys/pte.h presence... no
checking for sys/pte.h... no

Please feel free to email me if you really want to know more about this.

Jon

Jon Armitage

Web Infrastructure Support 

TEAMtalk.com

sportinglife.com

3rd Floor, Apsley House, Wellington Street, Leeds, LS1 2EQ 

Phone: +44 (0)113 3992013
Mobile: +44 (0) 7885 251454
Fax: +44 (0) 8701 283040
Websites: www.teamtalk.com, www.sportinglife.com 

The information contained in this email and its attachments are confidential
and may be the subject of legal, professional or other privilege.  It is
intended only for the named addressees and may not be disclosed to anyone
else without consent from TEAMtalk.  If you are not the named addressee you
are not authorised to disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on the
contents of this email and should immediately notify the sender and delete
the email from your computer.

Warning: It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward
transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not
adversely affect its systems or data. Please carry out such virus checks and
other checks as you consider appropriate. No responsibility is accepted by
TEAMtalk in this regard.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]