Re: AC_HEADER_STDBOOL rejects valid C99 implementation

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> > So, _Bool and bool are _not_ integer types.
>
> No, because ISO C99 section 6.2.5 paragraph 6 says:
>
>   The type _Bool and the unsigned integer types that correspond to the
>   standard signed integer types are the _standard unsigned integer types_.

You're right. I overlooked this paragraph.

> I've tried to file a bug report by posting in their forum at
> <http://forum.sun.com/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=96202>; I hope this
> induces them to fix the bug.

They are looking at these forums. I've added my prepared testcase to your post.

Bruno