[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non portable sed scripts
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: non portable sed scripts |
Date: |
Tue, 23 May 2006 14:40:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Hello,
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:33:42PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> you are so bright, Ralf!
this doesn't sound nice, I'm afraid.
I wanted to say that it was realy clever to notice that
> > | s,^\([ ]*#[ ]*\)[^ ]*\([ ][ ]*HAVE_DECL_STPCPY\)[
> > (].*$,\1define\2 0 ,
> > | HAVE_DECL_STRNDUP\)[ (].*$,\1define\2 0 ,
is actually a malformed sed script. And even more clever was to
connect it with that bug in the docs.
Well done! Thanks.
Stepan
- Re: non portable sed scripts, (continued)
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/21
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/21
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Stepan Kasal, 2006/05/22
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Tim Rice, 2006/05/23
- Re: non portable sed scripts, Tim Rice, 2006/05/22
Re: non portable sed scripts, Tim Rice, 2006/05/19
Re: non portable sed scripts, Tim Rice, 2006/05/23
Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/23
braced variable expansion in here documents (was: non portable sed scripts), Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/25
Re: braced variable expansion in here documents, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/25
Re: braced variable expansion in here documents, Stepan Kasal, 2006/05/25
Re: non portable sed scripts, Tim Rice, 2006/05/25
Re: non portable sed scripts, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/19