Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations

[Eric Blake]

Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:

> 
> So here's my proposed patch, which went with @{:@ and @:}@ for ( and ), 
written 
> prior to reading your suggestion.  Apart from the final spelling, does this 
> patch look sufficient?  Any other votes for the preferred spelling?

Plus this NEWS entry (again, with corrected spelling if desired):

** Two new quadrigraphs have been introduced: @{:@ for (, and @:}@ for ),
   allowing the output of unbalanced parantheses in contexts such as
   AS_HELP_STRING or AT_SETUP that must determine the length of
   expanded text.

-- 
Eric Blake