[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61 |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:12:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
Hello Ralf,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:13:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Pay attention that @samp{#undef} is in the first column, and there is
> > +nothing after @samp{HAVE_UNISTD_H}, not even white space.
>
> FWIW, the current code works fine with white space before '#' and
> between it and 'undef', it even keeps it in the output. Not sure
> whether you want to mention this, but IIRC the pre-awk code did
> this already.
I think you are right, and I think some users depend on thins.
E.g., the AH_VERBATIM template at the beginning of AC_C_BIGENDIAN
relies on the "# undef".
Could we just delete the above sentence?
Or perhaps:
"The line shall not contain anything else, except white space."
Stepan
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, (continued)
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/04
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/04
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/04
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/05
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/05
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/16
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/16
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/17
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/19
regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Karsten Hopp, 2008/06/04