Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-autoconf (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Feb 28 2009 16:44:59 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• February 28, 2009
  • Re: sharutils doc stuff, Bruce Korb, 16:44
  • Re: ac_vpsub quoting problem, Bruno Haible, 16:05
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:46
  • Re: ac_vpsub quoting problem, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:17
  • ac_vpsub quoting problem, Bruno Haible, 10:34
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Eric Blake, 10:07
  • Re: spurious "(cached)" output from AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:21
  • Re: spurious "(cached)" output from AC_CACHE_VAL, Eric Blake, 08:45
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Eric Blake, 08:33
• February 27, 2009
  • Re: spurious "(cached)" output from AC_CACHE_VAL, Bruno Haible, 17:36
  • Re: gcc on Irix 6.5, Bruno Haible, 10:31
  • Re: computing long double NaN on Irix 6.5, Eric Blake, 08:48
  • Re: permissions from make dist, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:27
  • permissions from make dist, Richard Cunningham, 01:19
• February 25, 2009
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Eric Blake, 16:52
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Bert Timmerman, 15:48
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Eric Blake, 08:18
  • Re: plz solve this bug, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:20
• February 24, 2009
  • Re: plz solve this bug, Eric Blake, 22:48
  • plz solve this bug, sivaram krishna, 22:11
  • Re: Explanation needed?, Eric Blake, 11:47
  • Re: Explanation needed?, Reuben Thomas, 07:37
• February 23, 2009
  • Re: Explanation needed?, Eric Blake, 23:19
  • Explanation needed?, Reuben Thomas, 09:35
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Eric Blake, 08:49
• February 22, 2009
  • [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 51 failed, Bert Timmerman, 18:32
• February 21, 2009
  • Re: computer bug, Ralf Wildenhues, 03:47
  • computer bug, Jess Naylor, 01:44
• February 16, 2009
  • Re: CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Karl Berry, 20:43
  • Re: CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:55
• February 13, 2009
  • Re: *** %n in writable segment detected ***, Eric Blake, 20:39
  • *** %n in writable segment detected ***, Martin Walch, 19:31
• February 03, 2009
  • Re: CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Karl Berry, 19:16
  • Re: CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Eric Blake, 11:19
  • Re: CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Eric Blake, 07:47
• February 02, 2009
  • Re: CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Karl Berry, 20:20
• February 01, 2009
  • Re: CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Ralf Corsepius, 23:27
  • CFLAGS is for the user in GNU, Karl Berry, 19:12

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc