[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_LANG_FUNC_LINK_TRY(C): stub detection fails with ICC 10.1
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_LANG_FUNC_LINK_TRY(C): stub detection fails with ICC 10.1 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:08:04 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Aaron Ucko on 6/6/2009 7:26 PM:
> Aaron Ucko <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> necessary for #include <limits.h> to yield a definition of PATH_MAX.
>
> Upon consideration, a better canary might be NAME_MAX or NGROUPS_MAX.
How is that? Are these more likely to be defined across all platforms
than PATH_MAX, showing that limits.h was valid? Also, does changing which
name we look for impact whether or not the -D_GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H hack would
be needed for your compiler?
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkovoiQACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDVcwCfQQK1rXNNMOChZctJIkUCvBfq
L5AAnR4cHbnOBsK+PC55O5ABZ4uVE486
=acny
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----