Re: AC_LANG_FUNC_LINK_TRY(C): stub detection fails with ICC 10.1

[Aaron Ucko]

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> How is that?  Are these more likely to be defined across all platforms
> than PATH_MAX, showing that limits.h was valid?

Yes; in particular, the Hurd generally avoids hard limits of that sort,
but still has a genuine NAME_MAX, and additionally defines a nominal
NGROUPS_MAX because POSIX requires it to.  (OTOH, I don't believe ICC
runs there anyway, so it largely depends on how you want to structure
the flow-control logic.)

> Also, does changing which name we look for impact whether or not the
> -D_GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H hack would be needed for your compiler?

No, those three are all equivalent in that respect.

Thanks!

-- 
Aaron Ucko <ucko at ncbi>, NCBI C++ Toolkit core development group