[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:02:38 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
[moving to bug-m4; replies can drop bug-autoconf]
According to Gene Spafford on 2/25/2010 11:10 PM:
> Thanks for the reply, Ralf.
>
> I am enclosing the output of the "make check" on the m4 build so you can see
> the failures.
M4 failures should be reported to the m4 list; so I've redirected accordingly.
All of the failures in your log look like:
Checking ./006.command_li
@ ../doc/m4.texinfo:979: Origin of test
./006.command_li: stderr mismatch
--- m4-tmp.13684/m4-xerr Fri Feb 26 01:01:42 2010
+++ m4-tmp.13684/m4-err Fri Feb 26 01:01:42 2010
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
+Must be attached to terminal for 'am I' option
+Must be attached to terminal for 'am I' option
hi
bye
Each of those tests invoke a subsidiary instance of m4 via the equivalent
to a system() call (that is, an instance of /bin/sh is spawned to find the
subsidiary m4). My guess is that you have a weird environment setup, such
that /bin/sh attempts to call who(1) during startup and ends up being
quite noisy. In other words, the bug is not in m4, but in your
/etc/profile, ~/.bashrc, or some other sort of script startup file. It is
bad practice to have noisy startup environment files.
I know of no way to make m4 robust against such a bad environment, where
the mere act of starting /bin/sh outputs junk to stderr before the
intended command passed to system() is even started.
--
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed, Gene Spafford, 2010/02/25
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/02/25
- Message not available
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/02/26
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed, Gene Spafford, 2010/02/26
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed, Gene Spafford, 2010/02/26
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/02/28
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.65] testsuite: 229 failed, Gene Spafford, 2010/02/28