[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: automake.texi and @acronym

From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: automake.texi and @acronym
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:52:22 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3

On 03/17/2010 03:50 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
>     I'm okay with changing the m4 and autoconf manuals with
>     s/@acronym{GNU}/GNU/ 
> s/@acronym{(.*)}/\1/ 
>     if we agree that it is easier to maintain, 
> Is to me.
>     and doesn't buy much typographically.
> I think having the (minor) benefit of consistency between GNU manuals
> outweighs the (minor) typographic refinement.

What about @sc{gnu}, which also appears in some but not all GNU manuals?
 Is there any difference between @acronym and @sc?

Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]