[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed]
|
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
|
Subject: |
Re: sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed] |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:43:03 +0200 |
> It's nice that the system sed is immune, and I wonder what GNU sed is
> getting tripped up on?
I also wonder that, since the GNU regex code explicitly accepts all
8-bit characters (except possibly 0 and 10 depending on the syntax
bits) for the `period'.
Paolo
- Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed, rochan, 2010/09/20
- Re: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed, Eric Blake, 2010/09/20
- Re: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed, Eric Blake, 2010/09/20
- sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed], Eric Blake, 2010/09/20
- Re: sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed], Eric Blake, 2010/09/20
- Re: sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed], Paolo Bonzini, 2010/09/21
- Re: sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed], Eric Blake, 2010/09/21
- Re: sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed], rochan, 2010/09/21
- Re: sed issue? [was: Subject: [GNU Autoconf 2.67] testsuite: 233 failed],
Paolo Bonzini <=