[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: autotest: problem testing daemons, with possible fix

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: autotest: problem testing daemons, with possible fix
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:28:45 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04)


* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 07:47:08PM CET:
> [Following up on
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2010-11/msg00036.html>,
> and adding bug-autoconf]

> --- a/lib/autotest/general.m4
> +++ b/lib/autotest/general.m4
> @@ -2190,7 +2190,7 @@ m4_define([_AT_CHECK],
>  AS_ECHO(["$at_srcdir/AT_LINE: AS_ESCAPE([[$1]])"])
>  ( $at_check_trace; [$1]
> -) >>"$at_stdout" 2>>"$at_stderr"
> +) >>"$at_stdout" 2>>"$at_stderr" AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD>&-
>  at_status=$? at_failed=false
>  $at_check_filter
>  m4_ifdef([AT_DIFF_STDERR($4)], [m4_indir([AT_DIFF_STDERR($4)])],

Looks good to me too.  Is it possible to devise an easy test case in
shell?  Asking because esp. the parallel Autotest code fiddles a lot
more with file descriptors so it would be nice to know we don't regress.
(I can look into writing a test case eventually.)

Luke, can you try out your testsuite with -j3 passed to it (in
TESTSUITEFLAGS if you call it through the documented makefile snippet)?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]