Re: AC_PROG_CC_* shouldn't append multiple options

[Adrian Bunk]

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 05:41:36PM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Adrian Bunk <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:59:14PM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>...
> >> Or, you asked "after what what compiler (plus language support
> >> library) should be considered as enough close to c99 for be counted as
> >> c99"?
> >> For me, the AC_PROG_CC_99 was good enough in that respect.
> >
> > You have ensured not to use any C99 features not tested by
> > AC_PROG_CC_C99 in your code?
> 
> Are you indeed belive in compiler, which claims to be c99 and doesn't
> support  _Bool and variadic macros?

These two are documented to be tested by AC_PROG_CC_C99.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed