Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit
the main index
.
You can also
download the archives in mbox format
.
bug-autoconf (date)
[
Thread Index
][
Top
][
All Lists
][
bug-autoconf info page
]
Advanced
[
Prev Period
]
Last Modified: Tue Jan 29 2013 17:17:35 -0500
Messages in reverse chronological order
[
Next Period
]
January 29, 2013
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 503 failed
,
Ray Lauff
,
17:17
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 503 failed
,
Paul Eggert
,
16:48
[GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 503 failed
,
Ray Lauff
,
12:18
January 25, 2013
Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers
,
Thomas Schwinge
,
07:03
Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers
,
Thomas Schwinge
,
06:39
January 23, 2013
Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers
,
Roland McGrath
,
17:37
January 21, 2013
Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
08:57
January 19, 2013
Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Eric Blake
,
09:25
Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
08:10
January 18, 2013
Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers
,
Thomas Schwinge
,
05:37
Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers
,
Thomas Schwinge
,
04:44
January 17, 2013
Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers
,
Thomas Schwinge
,
13:09
Re: Bootstrapping glibc vs. dependency on system headers
,
Joseph S. Myers
,
12:19
Re: AWK script has no effect when .in file has CRLF
,
Alexander Kruppa
,
09:33
January 16, 2013
Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
14:48
Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Eric Blake
,
13:55
Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Paul Eggert
,
13:02
Re: [PATCH] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE: define _DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE conditionally
,
Paul Eggert
,
12:29
Re: [PATCH] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE: define _DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE conditionally
,
PHO
,
09:14
Re: bug#13378: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
07:46
January 15, 2013
Re: [PATCH] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE: define _DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE conditionally
,
Eric Blake
,
22:07
[PATCH] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE: define _DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE conditionally
,
PHO
,
19:02
Re: AWK script has no effect when .in file has CRLF
,
Paul Eggert
,
12:52
AWK script has no effect when .in file has CRLF
,
Alexander Kruppa
,
10:16
January 14, 2013
Re: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Paul Eggert
,
22:16
Re: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
14:57
Re: Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics
,
Paul Eggert
,
14:45
Cleaning up AC_PROG_CC_C_O semantics (was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Automatically call AM_PROG_CC_C_O as required.)
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
05:24
January 09, 2013
F77 search order change request
,
Jonathan Hogg
,
11:07
January 06, 2013
autoreconf doesn't honor m4_include
,
Werner LEMBERG
,
13:03
[GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 286 359 360 failed
,
Stephen R. Darragh
,
12:28
January 05, 2013
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed
,
Joshua C.
,
04:20
January 04, 2013
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed
,
Eric Blake
,
21:10
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed
,
Joshua C.
,
20:49
January 03, 2013
Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
19:17
Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Eric Blake
,
19:12
[PATCH] AT_TESTED: fix regression in word splitting
,
Eric Blake
,
19:02
Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
19:01
Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
18:57
Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
18:54
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed
,
Eric Blake
,
18:47
Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Bob Friesenhahn
,
18:35
Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Eric Blake
,
18:31
Re: bug#13349: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
18:03
Re: Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Nick Bowler
,
17:53
Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure
,
Eric Blake
,
17:22
Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
17:10
Re-execute with the "correct" make implementation
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
17:05
[PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure
,
Eric Blake
,
16:54
Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally?
,
Eric Blake
,
16:34
Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally?
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
16:14
Re: bug#13349: [IMPORTANT] Could we just assuming support for make recursive variable expansion unconditionally?
,
Eric Blake
,
15:41
January 02, 2013
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed
,
Joshua C.
,
17:32
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed
,
Eric Blake
,
17:29
[GNU Autoconf 2.69.60-5766] testsuite: 132 failed
,
Joshua C.
,
17:11
Re: error with autoconf 2.69 and gccgo (error: cannot run Go compiled programs.)
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
13:14
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
13:10
error with autoconf 2.69 and gccgo (error: cannot run Go compiled programs.)
,
Markus Rothe
,
13:01
[GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 251 269 285 286 failed
,
Urs Traber
,
11:43
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed
,
Eric Blake
,
11:18
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
11:03
January 01, 2013
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69.59-adc84] testsuite: 132 355 failed
,
Stefano Lattarini
,
08:41
[
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc