[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ac_cv_sys_largefile_opts undocumented?

From: dmitrii . pasechnik
Subject: Re: ac_cv_sys_largefile_opts undocumented?
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:39:06 +0100

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 02:26:24PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2024-04-27 14:06, dmitrii.pasechnik@cs.ox.ac.uk wrote:
> > Thus I got questions whether a patch for a build system I submitted for
> > a project is OK, as it uses an undocumented variable (thus, perhaps,
> > unstable).
> Although it's poorly designed and not documented and not stable, the 
> patch may be good anyway. What's the patch for?

It's for nauty, a well-known program to deal with graph isomorphisms
etc. I've made a Gentoo patch here https://bugs.gentoo.org/921138
and I wanted to upstream it.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]