[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New vs. installed .m4 macro
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: New vs. installed .m4 macro |
Date: |
19 May 2001 23:04:39 -0600 |
>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Mai <address@hidden> writes:
Alexander> We have some auto* macros which we want to have in their
Alexander> own .m4 files, e.g. ac_find_xpm.m4.
Alexander> They "somehow" made their way into my ~/share/aclocal/
Alexander> directory. Now when I try to re-create e.g. lib/Xlt/aclocal.m4
Alexander> aclocal either takes only the pre-installed macro or at best
Alexander> I can force (by using "-I .") to have a warning about a
Alexander> duplicate macro definition. It however again takes the old,
Alexander> installed version :-(
Alexander> Either aclocal/automake would be a bit short-minded in its design
Alexander> or I haven't understood the docs fully and miss the proper
Alexander> way to handle this situation. The --acdir is a bit too strong,
Alexander> and doesn't seem to be useful here.
Yes, aclocal is short-sighted. You should either remove one copy of
the .m4 files, or use a single m4 directory, or something like that.
In the long term we plan to get rid of aclocal. It has proved to be a
source of trouble.
Tom
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: New vs. installed .m4 macro,
Tom Tromey <=