[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pointless automake error about libtool libraries
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: pointless automake error about libtool libraries |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:03:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
* Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:53:42PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > or from configure.ac:
> > AC_SUBST([gl_noinst_ltlibs], [libfoo.la])
>
> Uuh, after what you said above, this is betting on automake's unability
> to optimize AC_SUBSTed variables. What if automake improves...? Seems
> as dangerous to me as the first approach.
Actual AC_SUBSTed variables @substituted@ cannot be optimized: at
automake time, you can not know anything about them. With makefile
macros $(variable), there is a chance that an improved automake does
something different here.
> > But say, do you have two tools writing in the same Makefile.am (or does
> > one include the other)?
>
> Actually I'm lucky: the second tool (gnulib-tool) "sees" the output of
> the first tool (my hand), so I can actually handle this case in the
> second tool.
Good. Thanks for solving it this way.
Cheers,
Ralf
Re: pointless automake error about libtool libraries, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/08/22